\relax 
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Sensitivities studies and main results}{7}{section.3}}
\newlabel{sec:results}{{3}{7}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{section.3}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Average error [ps] of the reconstructed proper time difference between the two $D$ mesons in the decay $\Psi (3770)\to D\mathaccentV {bar}016D$ with $D\to K^-\pi ^+$, $\mathaccentV {bar}016D\to K^-\pi ^+$, as a function of the CM boost. As a comparison, the $D^0$ lifetime is 0.4\nobreakspace  {}ps.}}{7}{figure.1}}
\newlabel{fig:aveDeltaTErr_vs_bg_kpikpi}{{1}{7}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{figure.1}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Reconstruction efficiency of the decay $\Psi (3770)\to D\mathaccentV {bar}016D$ with $D\to K^-\pi ^+$, $\mathaccentV {bar}016D\to K^-\pi ^+$ as a function of the CM boost. The signal candidates are truth-matched and no additional selection cuts are applied, therefore the efficiency is essentially geometric. }}{8}{figure.2}}
\newlabel{fig:eff_vs_bg_kpikpi}{{2}{8}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{figure.2}{}}
\newlabel{RF1}{{3}{9}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Expected number of events as a function of the reconstructed decays. For the run at $\Psi (3770)$ we assume an integrated luminosity of 0.5\ensuremath  {\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}ab}^{-1}}\xspace  and we consider 3 scenarios for the CM boost, from 0.238 up to 0.91. The label ``$l^\pm X^\mp $'' for the $\Upsilon (4S)$ run should be read as ``at $t=0$ the $D$ flavor was determined to be $D^0$ ($l^+ X^-$) or $\mathaccentV {bar}016D^0$ ($l^- X^+$) through the selection of the $D^{*\pm }\to D^0/\mathaccentV {bar}016{D^0}\pi ^\pm $ decay''. All numbers are preliminary. N/A=Not Available. Numbers in parenthesis correspond to the suppressed decays, asuming current WA values for mixing and DCS to CF ratio.}}{9}{table.1}}
\newlabel{tab:final_states_list2}{{1}{9}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{table.1}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Central values, errors and pulls for the mixing and CP-violating parameters from the fit to the $\Psi (3770)$ Monte Carlo experiments, with perfect resolution and no mistag. The statistics for each of the 8 two-body double-tags is 1/10 of what is reported in the 3rd column of Table\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {tab:final_states_list2}. The generated values are the current HFAG values, $x=0.00628$, $y=0.00747$, $|q/p|=1$, $\phi =-0.179$ rad, $\delta _{K\pi }=3.525$ rad. }}{10}{figure.3}}
\newlabel{fig:ToyMcPsi}{{3}{10}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{figure.3}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{10}{figure.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{10}{figure.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(c)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{10}{figure.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(d)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{10}{figure.3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Central values, errors and pulls for the mixing and CP-violating parameters from the fit to the $\Upsilon (4S)$ Monte Carlo experiments, with perfect resolution and no mistag. The statistics for each of the 4 two-body double-tags is 1/200 of what is reported in the 2nd column of Table\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {tab:final_states_list2}. The generated values are the current HFAG values, $x=0.00628$, $y=0.00747$, $|q/p|=1$, $\phi =-0.179$ rad, $\delta _{K\pi }=3.525$ rad. }}{11}{figure.4}}
\newlabel{fig:ToyMcUps}{{4}{11}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{figure.4}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{11}{figure.4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{11}{figure.4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(c)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{11}{figure.4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(d)}{\ignorespaces {}}}{11}{figure.4}}
\newlabel{RF2}{{3}{12}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Estimated sensitivities for the mixing and CP violating parameters as determined from combined fits to all two-body double tags available at $\Psi (3770)$ and $\Upsilon $, using the expected number of events and proper time resolution as a function of the reconstructed decays from Table\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {tab:final_states_list2}. ``LB $\Psi (3770)$'', ``IB $\Psi (3770)$'' and ``HB $\Psi (3770)$'' data refer to the low ($\beta \gamma =0.238$), intermediate ($\beta \gamma =0.56$) and high ($\beta \gamma =0.91$) boost number of events, given in the 3rd, 4th and 5th columns, respectively, in Table\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {tab:final_states_list2}. According to Figure\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {fig:eff_vs_bg_kpikpi}, the expected number of events is approximately stable for $\beta \gamma $ in the range between 0.15 and 0.3. ``HB TG'', ``IB TG'', ``LB TG'' and ``VLB TG'' refer to the high ($\beta \gamma =0.91$), intermediate ($\beta \gamma =0.56$), low ($\beta \gamma =0.3$) and very low ($\beta \gamma =0.15$) triple Gaussian proper time resolution at $\Psi (3770)$ as estimated from FastSim and reported in Figure\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {fig:aveDeltaTErr_vs_bg_kpikpi}. The numbers in parenthesis are the total and core rms resolutions. The ``large mixing'' configuration has been generated with $x$ and $y$ values 10 times larger than the nominal (HFAG) values. The reported (rms) sensitivities for the mixing and CP violating parameters are for /10 and /200 the estimated number of events, for $\Psi (3770)$ and $\Upsilon (4S)$ data. The corresponding sensitities to the complete expected SuperB data can be extracted scaling those values by $\sqrt  {10}$ and $\sqrt  {200}$. }}{12}{table.2}}
\newlabel{tab:final_sensitivities}{{2}{12}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{table.2}{}}
\newlabel{RF3}{{3}{13}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Estimated sensitivities for the mixing and CP violating parameters as determined from combined fits to all two-body double tags available at $\Psi (3770)$ and $\Upsilon $, using the expected number of events and proper time resolution as a function of the reconstructed decays from Table\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {tab:final_states_list2}. ``LB $\Psi (3770)$'', ``IB $\Psi (3770)$'' and ``HB $\Psi (3770)$'' data refer to the low ($\beta \gamma =0.238$), intermediate ($\beta \gamma =0.56$) and high ($\beta \gamma =0.91$) boost number of events, given in the 3rd, 4th and 5th columns, respectively, in Table\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {tab:final_states_list2}. According to Figure\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {fig:eff_vs_bg_kpikpi}, the expected number of events is approximately stable for $\beta \gamma $ in the range between 0.15 and 0.3. ``HB TG'', ``IB TG'', ``LB TG'' and ``VLB TG'' refer to the high ($\beta \gamma =0.91$), intermediate ($\beta \gamma =0.56$), low ($\beta \gamma =0.3$) and very low ($\beta \gamma =0.15$) triple Gaussian proper time resolution at $\Psi (3770)$ as estimated from FastSim and reported in Figure\nobreakspace  {}\ref  {fig:aveDeltaTErr_vs_bg_kpikpi}. The numbers in parenthesis are the total and core rms resolutions. The ``large mixing'' configuration has been generated with $x$ and $y$ values 10 times larger than the nominal (HFAG) values. The reported (rms) sensitivities for the mixing and CP violating parameters have been scaled to the complete expected SuperB data by scaling by $\sqrt  {10}$ and $\sqrt  {200}$ the rms results from the Toy Monte Carlo experiments. }}{13}{table.3}}
\newlabel{tab:final_sensitivities}{{3}{13}{Sensitivities studies and main results\relax }{table.3}{}}
\@setckpt{results}{
\setcounter{page}{14}
\setcounter{equation}{9}
\setcounter{enumi}{0}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{0}
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{0}
\setcounter{section}{3}
\setcounter{subsection}{0}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{4}
\setcounter{table}{3}
\setcounter{Item}{0}
\setcounter{Hfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{NAT@ctr}{0}
\setcounter{subfigure}{0}
\setcounter{lofdepth}{1}
\setcounter{subtable}{0}
\setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
\setcounter{r@tfl@t}{3}
\setcounter{parentequation}{0}
\setcounter{linenumber}{1}
\setcounter{section@level}{1}
}